On June 1st, ICANN publised a shortreporton what they plan to do about registry failure.(It’s not a failure plan, it’s a plan to develop a plan.)They invited me to comment on it, so here’s what I said.You can see all thecomments on ICANN’s web site; the only other substantial one is theone from Chuck Gomes, although Ed Hasbrouck’s questions about the secretamendments to the .AERO registry are interesting, too.
Most of the report is pretty good. The first three sections give a goodoverview of the software and data involved in running a registry. Iagree with the taxonomy of failure scenarios in section 5.Section 4 tells us that voluntary transitions have consistently workedwell, so there is little reason to spend much time and effort worryingabout them or setting rules for them.Sections 6 and 7 are less good. I realize that they’re just guidelinesfor future work, but they have some problematic implicit assumptions,and do not, in my opinion, set out an adequate task list to preparefor many likely failure scenarios.
See more …Read More… (From E-mail, tech policy and more )